| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 |
181. Carrier Siege: Bring Carriers in line with Dreads, FAX's, and Ro... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: but it wont do that because 99% of the ppl ranting in that thread are not going to read this thread forcing a potential unique/interesting idea off the first page The first two threads on the second page of F&I are ...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 14:44:43
|
182. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Will PI set-ups be disabled while on Alpha clones? You can set up two characters with a decent PI set-up in a 30-day paid-for period, so unless planetary colonies are disabled during that time, it's going to be rather overpowered to pay once for a...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 14:39:11
|
183. Carrier Siege: Bring Carriers in line with Dreads, FAX's, and Ro... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: OOOOHHH so its just a rant thread then Honestly, yes, but it was an attempt at a constructive rant by trying to point out the problem by looking at things from the opposite direction.
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 14:35:58
|
184. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Will Alpha industrialists be limited in what they can build? It's a bit meaningless to say they can't research ME or PE when you can buy fully-researched BPO's, and considering the sheer number of characters free accounts could generate, the lack ...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 14:32:35
|
185. Carrier Siege: Bring Carriers in line with Dreads, FAX's, and Ro... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: ... wait so you are upset that if you want less risk (no core) you will get less reward but if you are willing to take the risk you get a better reward. No, I'm frustrated with everyone who is saying that. There are a ...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 14:29:01
|
186. Carrier Siege: Bring Carriers in line with Dreads, FAX's, and Ro... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: if it is just "the other ones have it" that is not enough Herein lies my issue, and my complaint. It's less about what one ship can or can't do and more about what other people are using that singular aspect as an exa...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 14:12:00
|
187. Carrier Siege: Bring Carriers in line with Dreads, FAX's, and Ro... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: the fact that carriers cant siege is the only reason to use them over dreads with HAW so no Perhaps I wasn't being clear. I'll try again: Take away their special cookie and balance them around having to siege just lik...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 13:48:02
|
188. Carrier Siege: Bring Carriers in line with Dreads, FAX's, and Ro... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Scotsman Howard wrote: Your idea comes from an argument on Reddit You say it "comes from Reddit" even though it has been brought up several times in the comments of the dev post on boost changes. Congrats. Scotsman Howard wrote: The NSA...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 13:37:25
|
189. Carrier Siege: Bring Carriers in line with Dreads, FAX's, and Ro... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
People are losing their collective minds over having to deploy a Rorqual in a belt, and one of the arguments I keep seeing is how Carriers don't have to lock themselves in place for five minutes. While others are pointing at one Special Cookie and...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.31 12:41:27
|
190. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tau Cabalander wrote: Actually, it was the capacitor reduction bonus that was removed. I hope the new ship buffs allow all strips to be activated at the same time, plus maintain a tank. The capacitor and cycle time were rolled into the same...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 22:00:07
|
191. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Poking around with numbers a bit, an All V's Rorqual will have a range of 43.75km when not sieged. Using a T1 Core, that becomes 87.5km, while a T2 Core makes it 131.25km. Would there be any consideration to increasing the Rorqual's Role Bonus fr...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 17:44:09
|
192. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
elitatwo wrote: Woow that are some changes. First, thanks for listening and not really listening. My idea was to have your links / boosts on grid as a hictor-bubble, not a sabre bubble. For command ships to really, really (not) shine, how abo...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 15:04:57
|
193. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lug Muad'Dib wrote: Now we will be able to solo pvp in a linked frigate with booster in the next system You apparently missed the part where it said that boosts will be canceled by gate travel
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 15:02:16
|
194. Make the Nestor great again! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Linus Gorp wrote: The Nestor never was great. What have you been smoking? The Nestor makes for a good logi boat in wormholes due to its low mass and appreciable tank.
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 14:59:51
|
195. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Noxisia Arkana wrote: @Lonan - I mean people play the game for different reasons. If you gave PVPers a way to generate killmails and post them to zkill to get their isk efficiency up without undocking there would be a ton of shittlers just plug...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 14:42:32
|
196. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Vidork Drako wrote: Another question : Q : I see you gave a weapon timer to booster, will they also receive a suspect time ? Nope, just a weapons timer. Could you (or another dev) elaborate on why you aren&...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 11:45:42
|
197. The 10.000 Forumposts club. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
At a mere 532 533, I prefer to think I go for quality over quantity.
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 02:53:35
|
198. How long the lost drone disappeared - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
It's either going to be indefinitely (as ships are), or 30 days (as anchored secure containers are). I can't remember which. The fastest way to get rid of them is to use combat scanner probes to scan them down and then collect them.
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.30 02:46:51
|
199. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Milla Goodpussy wrote: but a 1% difference between a capital ship and a sub capital ship.. is just total bullchit and someone who came up with those figures didn't even bother to look at the price difference between the two ships. "oh hey spen...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.29 20:40:37
|
200. Sticky:Dev blog: Command Bursts and the New World of Fleet Boosting - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Damocles Orindus wrote: No. A perfect Orca booster out performs a perfect non-sieged Rorqual. Thus no point to run the Rorq unless you have a immobilized it and put it at significant risk for 5 mins. If you don't understand the outcry, I gue...
- by Winter Archipelago - at 2016.08.29 20:22:35
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |